>> I am against summary demonetization of people’s online channels based merely on allegations. But I also recognize it is the right of said private companies to do so.
I additionally agree there is no conspiracy, but I fear that there is an inherent sense at these companies that Brand is “not one of us” because of his recent political shift, and that therefore everyone was faster to drop his monetization than if say Hunter Biden or Cenk Uygur had a YouTube channel and also faced sex assault charges.
I've been thinking about the "demonetization" issue and have come to the conclusion that it's not about taking a moral stand but rather a perhaps pathetic response to protecting their brand (no pun intended!).
Agreed, including with this:
>> I am against summary demonetization of people’s online channels based merely on allegations. But I also recognize it is the right of said private companies to do so.
I additionally agree there is no conspiracy, but I fear that there is an inherent sense at these companies that Brand is “not one of us” because of his recent political shift, and that therefore everyone was faster to drop his monetization than if say Hunter Biden or Cenk Uygur had a YouTube channel and also faced sex assault charges.
I've been thinking about the "demonetization" issue and have come to the conclusion that it's not about taking a moral stand but rather a perhaps pathetic response to protecting their brand (no pun intended!).